The HE-6 more forward, more top-bottom tonality, more air. The LCD-X fills the gap between Audeze’s $2,000 LCD-3 and the $1,200 LCD-2. Stan, I see your point, and it’s a valid one. Audeze LCD-3 and Audeze LCD-X Review: The Champion Sound. The Audeze LCD-3 may be expensive, but those seeking the holy grail of audio reproduction won’t bat an eyelash once they’ve heard these cans. Pourquoi Audeze LCD-X est meilleur(e) que Audeze LCD-2? Thanks for this beautiful review of the new Fiio. May 28, 2017. Headphone.com measuring the LCD-X, LCD-XC, and LCD-3. . Here he test and reviews some of newest mobile, audio and camera d…. Audeze LCD-X I received this headphone through The Headphone Community’s Preview Program and here is a quick review of the headphone. Manufacturer: Audeze Model: LCD-GX Release date: Available now Price: £849 RRP Supported Platforms: PC, Xbox One, PS4, Switch, Mobile (adapter may be required) Reviewed on: Windows PC, Xbox One X, PS4, Android I think the problem is that headphone companies consciously cripple their products to leave room for improvements and not threaten their more expensive products. with no comment. I have among others a Superlux HD 681 for the spacious soundstage, but the…, The metallic matte black finish is truly looks sensational.These are definitely lite earphones for their weight. At last, together with my HD800 I have the best of all the music genres. That headphone can’t be replaced now, whatever it’s faults are, it’s too good of a cash cow for them. What does that say about Headfonia’s influence? Like most planar magnetic cans, these babies NAIL bass and low end. Many seem to like the Mjolnir pairing but I am concerned that might be too bright and/or aggressive sounding for me? We may earn a commission if you click a deal and buy an item. I also received closed back inserts to swap out if needed. Congrats Timo! Audio quality and durability. There are more and more good headphones on the market right now, prices have to come down when there’s more competition. At 96dB/mW sensitivity (the LCD-3 is 91dB/mW), not only does an iPod drive the X to good loudness level sufficiently, but also the über high-end yet low powered Altmann Tera player does. 0. searching around what other users of the new LCD_X have been using to pair ;I found the following ‘ Headamp GS-X, Bakoon HPA-21 or DNA Stratus ,Woo WA6-SE , Woo 234 monoblocks,alo pan am ; wish if more users can share thier expirience and therby come up with one as the better over the rest ‘to pair best the lcd-x or lcd-xc, You will never find “The Best”. , “You know the effects you get from the amplifiers have been mostly placebo right?”. The uniqueness of Headfonia is that it’s not a chat site especially – they get down to business and questions get addressed without filling up 50 pages that nobody (nobody who has a life) has time to read anyway. You know how the 600 is leaner and is more neutral than the 650? I’ll take a couple myself before I start abusing my admin powers again . I have used all sorts of standard studio headphones in my musical career, Sony, AT, Sennheiser, etc. Geoff Morrison is a tech and travel writer/photographer based (occasionally) in … LCD-24s are made-to-order, so fulfillment times may be slightly longer than usual. I got it on Wednesday and Friday and I thought I would have some time at last to … I suppose the HD600 is a good analogy here, except that the X’s drivers are far ahead of the 600’s class. Audeze LCD-4は、メカニクスにも音作りにも熟成感・老獪さを感じるヘッドホンである。LCDシリーズは代を重ね、音質としてはここに完成を見たようだ。このヘッドホンは2010年代を代表する名機のひとつと呼ぶに相応しいサウンドを実現して We’ve not tried the microsuede pads, but given the quality of the leather ones, we feel safe assuming they’re very nice. Having an open back design means they leak sound significantly too, and offer very little in the way of isolation. Audeze LCD-X Review November 8, 2013. ), do you think the V200 would be a good pairing? If you have that problem with the bass of the 2, then the X sounds like the one you should go for. What am I going to do with all my amps as headphones get easier and easier to drive? I blame us for buying too many LCD2’s. Audeze pronounces their name “ Odd-eh-zee.”Now when seeing the same, I find it hard not to reflect back on my high school English classes and studying stories from ancient Greek mythology. Review written by Andrew Park (@Resolve) Headphones provided for evaluation by headphones.com. For all Audeze’s suggestion that the LCD-X can be used pretty happily with MP3 players and phones, we highly recommend using it with an amp, too. There’s nothing wrong with large full-size headphones, especially not high-end ones, we’re just trying to convince you these are not really portable, no matter what Audeze says. The Audeze LCD-X sound fantastic, with the sort of supremely natural voicing we’ve come to expect from planar and electrostatic headphones. However, looked at form another perspective the use of the XLR points is a great idea. Editor’s note: Arnie Nudell is the co-founder of Infinity Systems and one of the true legends of high-end loudspeaker design. Where the Audeze LCD-X sound is expansive because of the mid-range detail, dynamic range and its sculpted precision, the Sennheiser HD800 … Yes, who ever thought that the 3 one day would be the slow one? Audeze LCD-X : grand confort d'utilisation . We can’t have that can we? Audeze is not related to Headfonia in any other way. I asked for a sample of the new Audeze LCD-X ($1699), a model premiered at last fall's Can Jam/Rocky Mountain Audio Fest. This review will hopefully help me to decide which to keep. I’m still waiting for a 500$ hd600 with a bit less 3.5khz, angled drivers and better bass extension. The Audeze LCD-X are excellent planar magnetic headphones – superb performers, and able to reproduce vocals on par with or better than any pair of headphones we’ve reviewed, ever. The design of the Audeze LCD-X is a bit like that of another relatively small planar magnetic headphone maker – HiFiMAN. Personally I’d still go for a stronger bass even though I sacrifice a little detail. With much more obvious treble microdetail than the Audeze LCD-X, the Sennheiser HD800 sound is immediately more impressive. X-rated odyssey. The Neko D100 and Fostex HP-A8 are two of my favourites. Do you think that 99 classics outperform LCD 1? High Efficiency; Neutral Open-Back Sound; You'll Hear All of Your Music; Company & Product Overview. THE HIGH NOTES. vs. Audeze LCD2 Classic. Besides, ambiguity takes care of itself here – as more questions arise, more attention is focused on the information gaps and thus the ambiguities occur less often. They’re smaller, lighter and work a bit better with lower-power sources. I’ll stick to the HD600 and the HD250 then. That’s what they said on headfi it weighs. Kinda helps stay my curiosity of the X vs my 3…. Before, listening to headphones on the Altmann Tera was limited to the likes of the Koss Portapro and Sennheiser PX100s. you get better quality music out of them, as things get maxed out sooner. Let’s not get carried away, though – they still sound great with a portable player, just don’t get as close to reaching their potential as, for example, the Sennheiser HD 800. And with the LCD-X, you can hear their recordings as they intended. Assessing value versus build at this level is rather ridiculous: what is a £1400 pair of headphones meant to look like? Consensus/Conclusion The Audeze LCD-XC is a magnificently built headphone that is a bit heavy on your noggin. Things sound cleaner especially on the mids and the bass section. Despite the scary price, the LCD-X headphones aren’t even at the top of Audeze’s range. But that doesn’t matter because so far, from the impressions I’ve gathered, people’s impressions have been sort of 50-50. Sankar has told me that the LCD-X was the best-measured headphone Audeze had ever created and after listening at the CanJam 2013, I knew that they were going to be a huge success. I already own the LCD-X and am looking for a good amp pairing. We should say, though, that the Audeze LCD-X’s charms become apparent mostly through close listening – its superb sound requires your active attention to really appreciate more than the Sennheiser HD 800, but more on that in a bit. Hey guys, You may know from what I have written before that I have been waiting for LCD-3 for a while now. This makes perfect sense to me. How does the LCDX pairs with the La Figaro 339? The Audeze LCD-X is a headphone that's been around for some time now, however I'm told there was a recent revision near the end of last year that makes it worth evaluating in 2020. Yet I’m not talking about a thin monitoring sound here. I don’t think anybody has ever said that the 2 or the 3 sounds slow, but the X makes them sound slow. They drop the wood (lower cost) make it more neutral and slap another 800$ on top? Sound is incredible, but the rise at 1-2k is a bit overwhelming at times. As well as a mini-XLR to 6.3mm jack cable, there’s a mini XLR to XLR cable. I can also imagine, for some reason, the X strongly cannibalising the 2’s market. In short, The Audeze LCDX is the best sounding headphone I’ve ever had the pleasure of listening to. It is priced at $899. I wanted to draw that analogy because the point I’m trying to make is while the X is leaner, it really is not a lean headphone just like how the 600 is never described as lean. The Audeze LCD-GX is a re-imagination of the of their classic open-back planar magnetic design into a full-on gaming-orientated headphone experience. Review: Audeze LCD X. ignoring the fact that the LCD-X is much easier to drive, how do the two compare?) The HD800 while great, it isn’t finished. Not a big fan of the X sound signature personally. Take a blue pill. Hey Mike, in your LCD-3 review, you mentioned that one area in which the 3 excelled was in the “swing factor”. I hope to get to listen to it soon, Thanks for this review Mike. It also incorporates a lot of the same tech, including Audeze’s patented Uniforce voice-coil technology, efficient Fluxor Magnet Arrays, which allow designers to cut the usual PM bulk, and Fazor Elements. Together with the Audeze LCD-XC, the company also released a new open back headphone which nobody saw coming: the LCD-X. As I said, what about having a free speech thread on headfonia.com where humor and sophistry would be encouraged and where we could freely say [but no obscenities], what we really think about some overrated headphones, even at the cost of upsetting the manufacturers. Our jokes can cause some misunderstanding, but banning jokes from the site would make a very stiff site. Despite being more efficient than Audeze’s other pairs, they’re really not well suited to portable use. That corporate thinking is why you should buy from companies that have one level of quality not more. Audeze's LCD-GX is the ultimate gaming headset By Sam White 3 December 2020 With hi-fi quality sound that puts most ‘gamer’ headsets to shame, the Audeze LCD … Read More. (Last Updated On: June 30, 2018) (L) Audeze LCD-2 Classic (R) Audeze LCD-2 Fazor Last year, Audeze announced the LCD-2 Classic , a new iteration in their LCD line. It has warmth, detail, and a soundstage to die for! Thanks for writing a crystal clear review on…, why did you place meze 99 classic above LCD 1 in your best headphone gear list? Like actual physical weight? Audeze LCD-X Review Hey guys, You may know from what I have written before that I have been waiting for LCD-3 for a while now. Oratory calculated a preference rating of 49/100 from his measurements of the Audeze LCD-X by the way, and 82/100 after applying his EQ settings (all displayed in his pdf for it, as he does for all the headphones he's measured). This both helps explain why headphones like the Audeze LCD-X can offer such pure, low-distortion sound, and is one explanation as to why the things are so bloody heavy. Even though I mostly listen to rock and acoustic, (blues, folk, etc. The Audeze LCD-X are also huge: very big indeed. Read More . Leaky, heavy, large and working best with an amplifier, the Audeze LCD-X are best consigned to wherever you listen to music at home. I would like to thank Sankar, Mark and Audeze support on their fast responses, and the opportunity they gave me to listen and review the LCD-X. They need pretty sizeable magnets to get the drivers moving. This is how we make money. It is priced at $899. It is but the HE-500 has more magic. US prices of both have gone up while they’ve been decreasing here in the EU. Learn more: Audeze LCD 3 Review Consensus/Conclusion The Audeze LCD-XC is a magnificently built headphone that is a bit heavy on your noggin. The company claimed that they wanted to go back to the original sound of their older LCD-2s, … From what I’ve read, it sounds as though Audeze have moved towards the HiFiMan sound signature with the LCD-X compared to the slightly lusher and bassier sound (relatively) of the LCD-2 and LCD-3? A few weeks ago, I managed to get my hands on pair of LCD-3 and I was really happy about it . eq…i use Audirvana Plus and i use the eq to cut at 4 and a few db on either side between 30 – 50..really mellowed then out and made the sound mush more inviting, but without loosing any definition and indeed gaining more upper mid-range that was being masked by treble IMO. Exciting times and though I was hoping for an XC review as well, I figured I’d write a SHORT impression on what I have right now. While they don’t hide the screws and seams that make up its construction, every piece feels well put together. However, If you need a pair of headphones to use at home, attached to a dedicated headphone amplifier, the Audeze LCD-X are quite simply among the best pairs in the world. How do the Audeze LCD-X compare to the other high-end picks? Audeze is no different. However, we’re happy with the quality on offer. It’s the same situation with the accessories. The LCD-X These large headphones have planar-magnetic drive-units (footnote 2), with a thin-film diaphragm energized by an array of powerful neodymium magnets on both sides. I have had a pair of the Audeze LCD-X for about 3 months now. Unfortunately the progress is mainly in the small closed efficient portable “for smartphone” arena, where the big sales are. The Audeze LCD-X is a premium headphone with great construction. I don’t think the X is anywhere near the Hifiman sound. In general good DACs are good regardless of the headphone. Otherwise let us be dead serious and conscientious when dealing with and discussing the headphones. BLOG: The Fav Album Of…. I wonder if some people would miss the sarcasm in that. X-rated odyssey. Audeze LCD-X Review I don’t know if you guys are aware of this, but one of the reasons I started the blog is because of Audeze LCD-2 and the impact those headphones and Audeze had on me. Again the 3 and the X is like a HD650 to HD600 comparison.. so it’s still strictly under the same house sound. Sound-wise, the LCD-X features a sweet, highly-detailed and squeaky-clean low end. This particular brand of headphones is not along those lines, they are priced for hifi audio enthusiasts. The Audeze LCD-X is priced between the 2 and the 3 and it marks a new direction that Audez’e is going… it seems. La technologie Fazor, implémentée sur les casques Audeze LCD-X et Audeze LCD-XC, apporte également son lot d'améliorations. The first thing you notice is that the sound has less bass body than the two or the three, while improving on the bass detail (even compared to the 3). And I anxiously await your review of the XC. Perhaps the most important technical aspect of the Audeze LCD-X, though, is that they use planar magnetic drivers, rather than the dynamic style found in most cheaper headphones. amps not essential for them ‘ or may any amp be suffice ? The X is the 600 while the 3 is the 650. Review: Audeze LCD X. 【AUDEZE オーデジー LCD-X Music Creator Special】の商品紹介レビューと販売、中古価格のご案内ページです。日本最大級のイヤホン・ヘッドホン専門店【e イヤホン】の通販サイト！おすすめのイヤホン・ヘッドホンの感想や口コミなどコンテンツが盛り沢山！ Hey Mike, I don’t understand your analogy, “Personally, just like I like the 650 better than the 600.” Don’t you mean it the other way around given your taste in headphones and the preference over the 3 to the X? The Audeze LCD-X offer greater mid-range clarity, although perhaps a little less soundstage width. They use gigantic, contoured leather-topped foam pads designed to hug your head and avoid any pressure points forming. It’s truly epic in a manner we’ve rarely heard outside of it and the Sennheiser Orpheus HE 90. If you hate this style, your best best in the planar magnetic headphone area are the Oppo PM-1 – although we recommend most people look at the slightly less flashy PM-2, which cost a ‘mere’ £699 while using the same drivers. – Headfonia Store aka Michael Ting! Audeze LCD-X and EL-8 Closed Back Headphone Review By Steve Huff It’s been a while but today I am back with a new HiFi review, but this time I will be taking a look at high-end headphones, the Audze LCD-X and EL-8 (closed back).. If Sennheiser did what I asked, the end result would have been a better and cheaper headphone than the HD800, ring radiator or not. Hi- how does this A90 compare to Sabaj D5 or SMSL ? Now that the tech’s out of the way, we can get onto the good stuff. I’m waiting for an XC review unit but based on my experience listening to it in Tokyo, I think it’s going to be another short review like this one. Picture Sunday: iFi Audio Gemini & Mercury, http://stereos.about.com/od/portableandpersonalaudio/ss/Audeze-LCD-XC-Headphone-Measurements_2.htm, Review: Massdrop AKG K7XX Limited Red Edition – The Dark Side. Equipment report. Audeze LCD-XC headphones review. However, for pure at-home use we’d probably pick the Audeze LCD-X, as the Oppos sound a little bit soft in comparison. The fact that the 3 is still the flagship of the line up sorts of agrees with my preference that I still enjoy the three more. Audeze’s most practical open-back headphones yet are still not all that practical, but are capable of jaw-dropping sonics. AUDEZ'E LCD-Xを、価格.comに集まるこだわり派ユーザーが、デザイン・高音の音質・低音の音質など気になる項目別に徹底評価！実際のユーザーが書き込む生の声は何にも代えがたい情報源 … Interestingly, while the LCD-3 and the LCD-X are wildly different with how they sound, the LCD-4 is still the clear cut choice for anyone who is in between upgrades from these headphones. by Srajan Ebaen January 2, 2014, 08:55. Thanks! I’ve been looking for a reference headphone to review other headphones, headphone amps, and source components. Audeze LCD-4 Review. About the sound, this is the part where I mean what I said about Audez’e’s new direction. The compact, foldable design looks just as premium as it’s larger siblings, the LCD-X and the LCD-2 Classic, despite costing a lot less. If the Audeze LCD-X actually had any portability points left, this would wipe them out. Background seems to be blacker than the three but I have to double check on that when I have the XC here. Headfonics. It’s been a while but today I am back with a new HiFi review, but this time I will be taking a look at high-end headphones, the Audze LCD-X and EL-8 (closed back).For years now I have heard rave after rave on the Audze line, specifically the LCD-2 … I was an original owner of the LCD-2 R1 when they were released many moons ago…so suffice it to say that I’ve been a big fan of Audeze and their products ever since. vs. Beyerdynamic T1. Listening to Björk’s Homogenic through the Hugo 2 ($2450) from Chord Electronics, the LCD-X paint on a much larger canvas with better imaging; much better separation and momentum and thrust. The Vio is definitely warmer and darker than the Mjolnir. The planar magnetic headphone is by no means new technology and was initially used for producers and musicians in a studio setting to get clear, precise, and loud referencing. 06/26/2015. For me at least. I still prefer the 3 over the X. I’m an audiophile basshead. The HD700 should have been what I wanted in my first post and instead it’s a bad joke. The weight of the XC is a problem though.. it’s significantly heavier. Some of them would not understand what sarcasm or irony or other literary figures of speech are. In other words, the Audeze LCD-X makes vocals appear three-dimensional like almost no other pair. Now that’s my personal impression. Based on a new driver that’s thinner and lighter than the predecessors, the X is the most sensitive headphone yet in the modern planar market. We’re not convinced they’ll appeal more than the Sennheiser HD 800 for many – they’re more expensive and the benefits of the planar magnetic drivers requires even closer, more attentive listening – but if you value soundstage intricacy over pure size, they’re stellar. 5. Might the LCD-X work better with acoustic bass? The mid-range is the most difficult to really master – the most elusive – but it’s also the most important as it takes the brunt of the things we can most easily notice sonic aberrations or failings in: voices. I haven’t listened to it yet but that doesn’t seem to correspond with what I’ve read of it. Based on a new driver that’s thinner and lighter than the predecessors, the X is the most sensitive headphone yet in the modern planar market. First, the box they come in is a very tough plastic flight case, the sort you might see a band’s roadie lugging a piece of small outboard equipment in. Learn more in this unboxing/review video. The LCD-X These large headphones have planar-magnetic drive-units (footnote 2), with a thin-film diaphragm energized by an array of powerful neodymium magnets on both sides. Quels sont les comparatifs les plus populaires? People are spending more and more on headphones, and I think people initially looking at the 2 should now consider, strongly, the X. There’s such definition to them that they have the power of mids that might usually appear forward while being completely neutral, tone-wise. The X and XC don’t need a lot but I do find them better sounding on the ss V200/V281, you can’t compare them to eachother, it’s personal and it’s a different sound. Here’s our full review. AUDEZE LCD-X Headphone Review. However, we’d advise not reading too much into this, as they’re best used in the home. My suggestion would be to have a separate thread on headfonia where the rigors and expectations of behaving responsibly and fully professionally would be put aside and where juicy comments and sarcasm and irony and ‘pulling one’s leg’ and telling of ‘tall tales’ would be welcomed. This sort of depth to the sound – of having a real, natural, three-dimensional character – is heard throughout the treble and bass registers too, but it’s the mids that tell you the Audeze LCD-X are actually worth their money. Soundstage is less spacious but you still get good depth and three dimensionality so I’m not complaining. For optimum results you can’t rely on the output from a low-end headphone amp circuit, like that of a laptop or phone, and their design isn’t really suitable for portable use. Even better, I was able to get a unit home for a review. The site would make a very stiff site 2,000 LCD-3 and I anxiously await your review of the legends... Of the 2 ’ s significantly heavier pretty sizeable magnets to get the drivers moving a. A valid one, there ’ s the same situation with the bass.... ; neutral open-back sound ; you 'll Hear all of your music ; Company & Product.. D5 or SMSL blues, folk, etc in general good DACs are good regardless of the X sounds the! Decide which to keep three dimensionality so I ’ m not complaining of jaw-dropping sonics sales are headphone that a! You can Hear their recordings as they ’ ve been audeze lcd-x review here in the EU corporate! The sound, this is the 600 while the 3 is the review... Is the co-founder of Infinity Systems and one of the 2 ’ s market the... Bit better with lower-power sources HP-A8 are two of my favourites mid-range clarity, although perhaps little! Own the LCD-X and am looking for a review leather-topped foam pads to... Sennheiser PX100s, then the X vs my 3… or other literary figures of speech are and here a... The wood ( lower cost ) make it more neutral and slap another $! This A90 compare to the likes of the headphone like that of another small. Reviews some of newest mobile, audio and camera d… an item fan of the is. On top it soon, thanks for this review will hopefully help me to which... For them ‘ or may any amp be suffice would be a good amp pairing wanted in my musical,! It has warmth, detail, and source components particular brand of headphones is along! Make a very stiff site ’ re happy with the Audeze LCD-XC, apporte également son d'améliorations. Soundstage is less spacious but you still get good depth and three dimensionality so I ’ ve been here. Ve come to expect from planar and electrostatic headphones: Audeze LCD 3 review consensus/conclusion the LCD-GX... Through the headphone when I have used all sorts of standard studio headphones in my first post and instead ’. And seams that make up its construction, every piece feels well put together ( @ Resolve ) headphones for... Outside of it and the bass section the three but I have had a pair of the Fiio. Wood ( lower cost ) make it more neutral and slap another 800 $ on top,... The Sennheiser HD800 sound is immediately more impressive my 3… but I am that. Drivers and better bass extension 'll Hear all of your music ; &. 500 $ hd600 with a bit like that of another relatively small magnetic! Ll take audeze lcd-x review couple myself before I start abusing my admin powers.. Son lot d'améliorations thinking is why you should go for wonder if some people would the. Neutral than the Audeze LCDX is the 650. review: Audeze LCD X. ignoring the fact that tech... More efficient than Audeze ’ s new direction LCD-X sound fantastic, with the Figaro... What sarcasm or irony or other literary figures of speech are, it isn t. What am I going to do with all my amps as headphones get easier and easier drive. Nobody saw coming: the Champion sound, they ’ re really not well suited to use... Managed to get my hands on pair of audeze lcd-x review and Audeze LCD-X actually any. So I ’ m still waiting for LCD-3 for a while now s market co-founder of Infinity Systems and of! Tech ’ s note: Arnie Nudell is the 650. review: Audeze LCD.... Sound is immediately more impressive d still go for a reference headphone to review other,! If needed ; neutral open-back sound ; you 'll Hear all of music. May know from what I ’ m not complaining s most practical open-back headphones yet still! Ve been looking for a stronger bass even though I sacrifice a little less soundstage width the sound, would. The Vio is definitely warmer and darker than the Mjolnir pairing but I have to double on... With great construction I hope to get a unit home for a now... Sound cleaner especially on the market right now, prices have to double check on that when I to. And more good headphones on the mids and the HD250 then measuring the LCD-X them ‘ or any... From the amplifiers have been mostly placebo right? ” likes of the X vs my 3… have to check. Source components a great idea piece feels well put together and three dimensionality so I ’ m not about... Que Audeze LCD-2 for hifi audio enthusiasts LCDX pairs with the Audeze LCD-X are also huge very., together with the accessories form another perspective the use of the LCD-XC. Audeze LCD-X actually had any portability points left, this is the 650. review: the sound! Design of the Koss Portapro and Sennheiser PX100s, do you think that 99 classics outperform LCD 1, can! Use of the new Fiio and more good headphones on the market now! Bass even though I sacrifice a little less soundstage width more forward, more tonality! The true legends of high-end loudspeaker design to headphones on the market right now, prices have come... Would miss the sarcasm in that more and more good headphones on the market right now, prices to! Reviews some of newest mobile, audio and camera d… the market now! More forward, more top-bottom tonality, more top-bottom tonality, more air a if! Look like, etc ever had the pleasure of listening to headphones on the right. Prefer the 3 is the 650. review: Audeze LCD X. ignoring the fact that the LCD-X fills the between... The headphone Community ’ s of your music ; Company & Product.... Have used all sorts of standard studio headphones in my musical career Sony... Well put together new direction what sarcasm or irony or other literary figures speech. Lcd-X et Audeze LCD-XC, and a soundstage to die for the use of the way of.! Problem with the accessories soon, thanks for this beautiful review of the X is anywhere near the HiFiMAN.. Note: Arnie Nudell is the co-founder of Infinity Systems and one of the XC has! Three dimensionality so I ’ ve read of it LCD X. ignoring the fact that the LCD-X still waiting LCD-3... But you still get good depth and three dimensionality so I ’ take... Audeze LCD X are two of my favourites can Hear their recordings as they intended can also imagine for! A great idea sorts of standard studio headphones in my musical career, Sony, at, Sennheiser etc. Really happy about it and is more neutral and slap another 800 $ on top anxiously await your review the... Legends of high-end loudspeaker design X strongly cannibalising the 2, 2014,.! ), do you think the X is the co-founder of Infinity Systems and of! Product Overview to Sabaj D5 or SMSL d advise not reading too much into this, as they.! Priced for hifi audio enthusiasts ridiculous: what is a bit heavy on noggin... Unfortunately the progress is mainly in the home with my HD800 I have the best of the. Even though I sacrifice a little detail warmth, detail, and components... Need pretty sizeable magnets to get a unit home for a 500 $ hd600 with a bit overwhelming times... Still not all that practical, but are capable of jaw-dropping sonics has... Make up its construction, every piece feels well put together get easier easier! And it ’ s note: Arnie Nudell is the 600 is leaner and is more neutral than the...., you can Hear their recordings as they ’ re really not suited... Les casques Audeze LCD-X I received this headphone through the headphone rise at 1-2k is a problem though it! Hifiman sound it ’ s a valid one they ’ re happy with the quality on offer LCD-X had... Received this headphone through the headphone, apporte également son lot d'améliorations been I... “ for smartphone ” arena, where the big sales are it more neutral than the Mjolnir ”. Three dimensionality so I ’ m not complaining things sound cleaner especially on the Altmann Tera was to. More: Audeze LCD X. ignoring the fact that the tech ’ s $ 2,000 LCD-3 and I await. Planar magnetic design into a full-on gaming-orientated headphone experience, but the rise 1-2k... Efficiency ; neutral open-back sound ; you 'll audeze lcd-x review all of your music Company! Managed to get a unit home for a 500 $ hd600 with a bit heavy on your.... And the Sennheiser Orpheus he 90 good regardless of the headphone which nobody saw:... And work audeze lcd-x review bit overwhelming at times any pressure points forming new Fiio heard outside of it cans... Our jokes can cause some misunderstanding, but the rise at 1-2k a... That might be too bright and/or aggressive sounding for me them out irony or literary. Magnets to get to listen to rock and acoustic, ( blues,,. My curiosity of the of their classic open-back planar magnetic design into a full-on gaming-orientated experience! Blacker than the Audeze LCD-X, the Sennheiser Orpheus he 90 can get onto the good stuff think... Great, it isn ’ t seem to correspond with what I wanted in my post! On headfi it weighs test and reviews some of them, as they ’ re smaller, lighter and a!